The SI swimsuit issue has always struck me as an anachronism. Many of the women in the Twitter posts were wearing no clothes at all. Yes, America's most legendary sports magazine is still in the soft-porn business, and by now has abandoned all pretense of selling swimsuits. Why am I bringing this puerility to the sports pages of The Press Democrat? Because the source was the Twitter account of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue. Go take a shower now if you'd like, but there won't be enough soap and hot water to wash away the creepiness of the campaign. Agdal was photographed propped up on a beach, facing the camera, legs parted her genitalia were obscured by a skimpy application of sand and rhinestones. If you're not familiar with the word “vajazzled,” all you need to know is that Ms. Pictured was a bare woman lying in shallow, rocky getting vajazzled is the hottest thing you'll see this week,” read another, along with the fire emoji. The text was followed by the happy-face-with-hearts-for-eyes emoji.Īnother tweet was speechless as well as breathless, communicated only by emojis: water splashing, hearts-for-eyes, water splashing, hearts-for-eyes. “This nude photo of is the Friday afternoon treat you were waiting for,” read one. Over a period of several days, the feed posted a series of photos, all of naked or nearly naked women, along with leering messages. A certain Twitter feed was knee-deep in raunch three weeks ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |